On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 18:55 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > > I hereby modify the text of Proposal 6072 (which would have been failed > > due to insufficient power anyway, btw) to read: > > Oops, did I miss the place where registration status was secured (I looked > for it but did so quickly). -G. > First para of rule 869. It's secured at 2.
-- ais523
