On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > (R754/9 makes the "guidance" of low-power > rules purposefully weak; the expressed legislative purpose was to > prevent low-power definitions, especially implicit ones, from > overruling common usage or strong contextual definitions of terms > contained in high-power rules, to prevent just this sort of scam).
Oh and btw, this scam makes me happy, in that this re-write of R754 was specifically meant to block definitional ladder scams, and this is a non-trivial version of such a scam (relying on deep implicit definitions and contextual assumptions on both sides) so it's a really nice and direct test (and the first important one?) however it turns out. :) -G.
