On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Seems to be a part of Zefram's mass generalizations. Although even >> with the distinction, when something ceases to be a rule, it pretty >> much no longer exists in legal Agoran terms (at least in normal >> circumstances), so it's hard to say that's not legally "destroying" >> it. > > I transfer one coin to the entity formerly known as Rule 2184. :P
You can do that with entities that have been previously "destroyed" as well, as far as I can tell. :P
