On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 18:55 -0500, comex wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems to be a part of Zefram's mass generalizations. Although even > > with the distinction, when something ceases to be a rule, it pretty > > much no longer exists in legal Agoran terms (at least in normal > > circumstances), so it's hard to say that's not legally "destroying" > > it. > > I transfer one coin to the entity formerly known as Rule 2184. :P
Can't, it isn't a party to the PBA. We really need some random useless asset to transfer round to test asset rules. Maybe I should bring back Silly Hats... -- ais523
