ehird wrote: > I intend to appeal this judgement. > > One word: archives.
Gratuitous: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-April/019041.html The attachment purportedly used to initiate this case is readable with no special effort - unlike, say, http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-April/019129.html which requires the user to recognize it as base64-encoded text. (Note that ehird is not the only offender of this sort.) This second example demonstrates that, while readability in the archive is desirable, it is not the same as readability in one's own mail reader.
