On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> ehird wrote: > > > I intend to appeal this judgement. > > > > One word: archives. > > Gratuitous: > > > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-April/019041.html > > The attachment purportedly used to initiate this case is readable with > no special effort - unlike, say, > > > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-April/019129.html > > which requires the user to recognize it as base64-encoded text. (Note > that ehird is not the only offender of this sort.) This second example > demonstrates that, while readability in the archive is desirable, it is > not the same as readability in one's own mail reader. > Besides, this couldn't have been a CFJ if it was FALSE anyway.
