On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Taral wrote: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > >> Oh bribery proposals are cute. It's a good test every so often to see > >> if the current players are a group of voters you want to be playing a > game > >> with. And deregistration is good test to use as, whichever the answer, > >> one doesn't have to follow up. :) -G. > > > > I guess I'm a little touchy right now because the game has been very > > chaotic recently. What with the rapid succession of scams, it feels > > like little progress can be made in terms of game development. This > > just looked like a coup-de-grace, if you will. > > This. Is anyone willing to maintain a Schroedingor's report, even > if unofficially? > > I am. Would it be weekly or monthly? -- C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
