coppro wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> CoE: ais523 is not the author of this proposal; e retracted eir
>> version shortly before I distributed. I believe the precedent is that
>> it was distributed with no author, although my reading of the current
>> rules makes it look to me that I'm the author. In either case, it's a
>> recipe for timing scams.
>
> Proposal: Fix Promotion Mistakes (AI=3)
> {{{
> In Rule 107, replace
>
> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
> initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
> to initiate the decision. This notice is invalid if it lacks
> any of the following information, and the lack is correctly
> identified within one week after the notice is published:
>
> with
>
> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
> initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
> to initiate the decision. This notice must include the following
> information, and is invalid if it lacks any of this information,
> or the information is incorrect (and the incorrect information
> could not constitute a valid alternate method of initiating the
> decision; this does not include taking other actions implicitly
> as a part of the Decision's initiation).
> }}
>
> This should clear things up.
It will do precisely the opposite. Validation of notices where no one
notices an error promptly is an intentional form of quasi-ratification.
