On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> comex wrote:
>>>>> 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro Maple Leaf Dominance
>>>> AGAINST, grammatically incorrect ("it's" vs "its") and despite the AI
>>>> it would create a Power=1 rule by default
>>> Bah.
>>>
>>> Proposal 6310 (AI=2.0, Interest=1):
>>> Maple Leaf Dominance 2.0
>>
>> The above, if an attempt to initiate an Agoran Decision, lacks a clear
>> indication of the options available and is incorrect, as Proposal
>> 6310's title is not "Maple Leaf Dominance 2.0".
> Negative; it was a submission of a proposal, and should be interpreted
> as such.
Why did you label it with the ID number of an existing proposal?
