On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

>
> I withdraw my previous proposal, "Two tiered tiebreaker".
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Two tiered tiebreaker", AI 2.0,
> ais523 coauthor:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by deleting:
>                 If the time period ends with no majority judgement,
>      the panel acts to deliver a judgement of REMAND.
>
>  Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by inserting the following new
>  paragraphs immediately after the paragraph in which the above
>  deletion occurred:
>
>      If the time period ends with no majority judgement, then:
>      - if the Justiciar has published an opinion on the case
>        clearly marked as the Justiciar's Opinion and indicating
>        a valid judgement, and that judgement is the same as
>         one given by at least one panel member (other than the
>         Justiciar), then the panel delivers that judgement;
>
>       - otherwise, the case enters an overtime period, which
>        lasts for four days.  The CotC SHOULD publicly remind the
>        Justiciar when an overtime period begins.  During
>        this period, if the  Justiciar publishes a Justiciar's
>        Opinion that is the same as one panel member's as
>        described above, then the panel delivers that judgement;
>
>      - otherwise, the CotC CAN and SHALL, asap after the
>        overtime period ends, act for the panel by announcement
>         to deliver a judgement of either REMAND or REASSIGN,
>        whichever e feels is most appropriate.
>
>
> Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing the paragraph
> that begins with "b) Justiciar" with the following paragraph:
>
>      b) Justiciar.  The Justiciar may be granted particular
>      abilities or privileges associated with the judicial
>      process as described elsewhere in the Rules.
>
>  [The Justiciar can just submit an opinion when e feels like it,
>  and it's used as the tiebreaker when needed].
>  -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

The overtime period probably should end as soon as the Justicar submits his
opinion.

Reply via email to