Yally wrote: > I CFJ on the following sentence. The IADoP's report includes the date > eir previous report was submitted, not the date eir current report is > being submitted. > > Evidence: Rule 2138 > > The IADoP's report includes the following: > > d) The date when that office's reports were last published. > > Arguments: > > This essentially boils down to the timing of events. If the IADoP's > report is considered to have been submitted prior to the data contained > within, then the judgment should be FALSE. If the IADoP's report is > considered to have been submitted after the data contained within, then > the judgment should be TRUE. If they are considered to be submitted > simultaenously, then the judgment should be UNDECIDABLE.
Gratuitous: When I was IADoP a few years back, my list of dates-last-published routinely listed "(as of this message)" for the IADoP itself.
