2009/5/26 Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>: > I CFJ on the following sentence. The IADoP's report includes the date eir > previous report was submitted, not the date eir current report is being > submitted. > > Evidence: Rule 2138 > > The IADoP's report includes the following: > > d) The date when that office's reports were last published. > > Arguments: > > This essentially boils down to the timing of events. If the IADoP's report > is considered to have been submitted prior to the data contained within, > then the judgment should be FALSE. If the IADoP's report is considered to > have been submitted after the data contained within, then the judgment > should be TRUE. If they are considered to be submitted simultaenously, then > the judgment should be UNDECIDABLE. > One way of writing it that I recall has been used is "Last submitted: <as of this message>".
-- -Tiger
