On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > Goethe wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with >>> 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. >> >> Why bother with distributability then. -G. > > To avoid going through the motions for proposals that no one else > is the least bit interested in? Both methods have a downside (W3S > involves more messages, WO involves a minimum 4-day wait).
Might as well take out the "notes" part then because it makes the economic side worthless. -G.
