On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Goethe wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with > >> 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. > > > > Why bother with distributability then. -G. > > To avoid going through the motions for proposals that no one else > is the least bit interested in? Both methods have a downside (W3S > involves more messages, WO involves a minimum 4-day wait).
If nobody else is interested, should they be proposals? I'll likely vote AGAINST this one, if it comes to a vote. -- ais523
