On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 09:35 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > AGAINST. This should allow Private contracts to do so as well (if > the contract detail is published when the act is performed). > Otherwise, we'd just make zoop around it with some weirdness like "in > this private contract, the contractees CAN make a public contract an > instant before acting on behalf of, to which the contractees pre- > agree to agree to..."
I have at least one private contract with a trigger that does exactly that. I think in this case, needing such a trigger is a good thing, so that everyone knows the details of the actions that are being taken; why require simultaneous publication in more than one rule, when we have a rule that deals with publicising of contracts already? -- ais523
