On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote: >> Ah yes; my trigger publicises the whole contract. Doing it with portions >> wouldn't necessarily be too difficult, though; you only need one slave >> contract, which can be amended to add parties actions as needed. > > My whole point is, sure you can do that, but it adds a bureaucratic and > easy-to-screw-up overhead that doesn't actually add anything of value, > when the alternative is to have the proposed Rule allow relevant clauses > of private contracts to work. -G.
See my recent action. -- -c.
