2009/7/30 Roger Hicks <[email protected]>: > False. Obama published it, not the state of Hawaii. Its not a birth > certificate but a Certificate of Live Birth (confusing name, but > different document), issued (at the time) by Hawaii to infants as old > as a year. No hospital or attending physician, and possibly even a > forgery. But who cares about the truth? He's a great guy....hope and > change and all that other nice stuff.
I really tried not to respond to this message. I truly did. Apologies to all of you who are here to, say, play nomic — I must indulge, as it were, for the duration of an email. Feel free to ignore. --Cut on the dotted line-- > Obama published it, not the state of Hawaii. And then, the state of Hawaii confirmed it.[1] > possibly even a forgery. See [1] and [2]. > He's a great guy....hope and change and all that other nice stuff. Nice sarcasm, but I strongly disagree with basically everything he's done. From the rest of the world, even in the near-police-state Britain, your political system is hilarious: you get to choose between far-right or slightly further right. That doesn't change the fact that conspiracy theories are. It's like claiming that Belgium doesn't exist[3]: trivially falsifiable and with no justification; just random assertion. Can't you right-wingers attack the policies instead? 1. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090728/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_birth_certificate 2. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
