On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 16:52, comex<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Roger Hicks<[email protected]> wrote: >> I hardly consider snopes.com an objective source, > > With all due respect, did you actually read the snopes article and the > sources it cites? > I have read snopes article on the subject in the past, investigated their sources (the few they had at the time), and found the whole thing to be rather biased and poorly backed. However, I must admit I didn't click the snopes link in ehird's message. Now that I've followed it I see it has been significantly updated and references many more sources than previously. I'll give it another read-through and check out what they have to say.
BobTHJ
