Re: DIS: Re: BUS: intent, NoV

[Sean Hunt]

Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
> 
>>> I spend an Absolve-o-matic (sp) to destroy a Rest in my own possession.
>> TTttPF
> 
> As a few of us have recently found out, Absolv-o-Matic is ineffective
> because its rule has too low Power to satisfy securing of Rest changes.
Oh, wonderful :/