Wooble wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote: >>> Fails, Absolve-o-matics are broken atm. >>> >>> -- >>> ais523 >> I think quorum is such that you could fix it personally by voting FOR >> 6409 right now (and if you feel like it, 6407-6408 are also straightforward >> fixes). -G. > > I only count 17 eligible voters on these anyway: ais523, BobTHJ, > C-walker, coppro, ehird, G., Murphy, Pavitra, pikhq, Rodlen, Sgeo, > Siege, Taral, teucer, woggle, Wooble, zeckalpha. Quorum was 6, and my > votes to the PF were never counted so it's possible the voting period > wasn't even extended.
The Assessor DB does not track past registration or activity history, it estimates quorum based on current state (and warns that it may be wrong); this is usually not an issue because quorum is usually exceeded by a comfortable margin. I may rewrite it properly as a Django exercise if I ever get a new server.
