ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 07:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: 
>> I retract my proposal "Kill it with fire".
>> 
>> I submit the following proposal, and intend (without objection) to
>> make it distributable:
>> 
>> Proposal:  Kill it with fire
>> (AI = 2, II = 0, please)
>> 
>> Terminate the contract that was known as Points Party at the time this
>> proposal was submitted.
> 
> I object.
> 
> If possible (i.e. if one or more of my mousetraps so far have
> succeeded), I act on behalf of Murphy to cause em to destroy all eir
> Distrib-u-matic cards.

Bad form. Even if objecting to the intent was necessary, conditionally
destroying the cards compounds gamestate ambiguity needlessly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to