On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > This distribution of proposal 6958 > > initiates the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt it. The eligible > > voters are the active players at the time of this distribution > > In case anyone wants to try to judicially punish this scam, I'll note > that this description of the class of eligible voters is incorrect, as > are the explanatory comments of the form "(Everyone but me has N > rests)." (Yally had more, and Murphy had less.)
What's incorrect about eligible voter description? It's the boilerplate from many previous and I believe it's technically accurate. I agree I made I made some errors in some explanatory parenthetical statements which might be subject to NoV. -G.
