On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> What's incorrect about eligible voter description? It's the boilerplate
> from many previous and I believe it's technically accurate.
As I saw ais523 mention in the IRC backlog, the class of eligible
voters you specified ("active players at the time") would include you
even if you deregistered, but the one specified by Rule 2156 ("players
who were active at the time") would not.
I'm not even going to try figuring out how this interacts with Rule
107. However, I'll note that the proposal (both of them actually)
that purportedly fixed ratification was distributed with the same
incorrect description, and I actually deregistered during its voting
period, making it a substantive error. The resolution was also
incorrect, as it included me in the vote tally.
