While waiting for CFJ 3117 I got behind on browsing Delve progress.
When 3117 was decided it gave the weak idea that the delve didn't happen, but it failed to find that I acted "in arbitrary and capricious disregard for these regulations" which would be required for a judge to override my own decision as contestmaster. Therefore I don't think that precedent has overruled my decision to let the delve stand. I was meaning to call a CFJ on that (e.g. for a clear decision on the statement "G. acted in arbitrary and capricious disregard for the contest regulations in letting the delve stand") but I was/am loath to delay things still further. I plan to catch up on delve progress this weekend and continue to assume that it happened, and also propose extending future delve periods from 1 to 2 weeks (seems to take a little time for results to percolate). Any discussion on this? If there is a strong opinion that the follow-up CFJ is needed, I'll call it and won't waste time resolving the delve until it's called and settled (likely meaning no new delve starts until post-holiday, I was hoping for a delve that could function across holidays). -G.
