On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:42 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > While waiting for CFJ 3117 I got behind on browsing Delve progress. > > When 3117 was decided it gave the weak idea that the delve didn't happen, > but it failed to find that I acted "in arbitrary and capricious disregard > for these regulations" which would be required for a judge to override my > own decision as contestmaster. Therefore I don't think that precedent > has overruled my decision to let the delve stand. > > I was meaning to call a CFJ on that (e.g. for a clear decision on the > statement "G. acted in arbitrary and capricious disregard for the contest > regulations in letting the delve stand") but I was/am loath to delay > things still further. > > I plan to catch up on delve progress this weekend and continue to assume > that it happened, and also propose extending future delve periods from 1 > to 2 weeks (seems to take a little time for results to percolate). > > Any discussion on this? If there is a strong opinion that the follow-up > CFJ is needed, I'll call it and won't waste time resolving the delve > until it's called and settled (likely meaning no new delve starts until > post-holiday, I was hoping for a delve that could function across > holidays).
I think the Delve stands; you haven't done anything massively against the spirit of the contest, and I'm not entirely convinced that the letter matters, except as an intellectual exercise (which is half the fun in Agora, anyway). -- ais523
