On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Alex Smith wrote: > (Thanks to Bucky for discussing this with me.) > > CFJ (barring Bucky): With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules > that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted, Just curious, since interpretations are of the ruleset at the time the CFJ is called, is there a reason to be extra-protective here about ruleset changes? -G.
- DIS: Re: BUS: I think we found a time paradox Kerim Aydin
