On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:59 PM, ais523 <[email protected]> wrote: > [When the rule was changed from being written in negatives to being > written in positives, the change in part (d) seems not to have taken De > Morgan's Law into account.]
Actually, it's not a typo. Part (d) was changed alone by Proposal 6932 (scshunt), which in context (it was submitted as a Judge's Proposal for CFJ 2910) was clearly intended to weaken the reasonable belief defense.
