On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Splitting hairs > (AI = 1.7, co-author = G.) > > Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by replacing this text: > > The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based > on the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry > case was initiated: > > with this text: > > The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based > on the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry > case was initiated (if its truth value changed at that time, then > its initial truth value is used): Out of curiosity, what would your opinion have been given the current ruleset if I'd have asked it correctly. Eg. "I CFJ on the following: the CotC is currently required to assign this case to a judge". I think the current precedent, insomuch as we've thought about it, is opposite your proposal; for example, for the typical "this statement is false" CFJs we assume the statement has been (already) made. -G.
