On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, omd wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Out of curiosity, what would your opinion have been given the current > > ruleset if I'd have asked it correctly. Eg. "I CFJ on the following: > > the CotC is currently required to assign this case to a judge". > > > > I think the current precedent, insomuch as we've thought about it, is > > opposite your proposal; for example, for the typical "this statement is > > false" CFJs we assume the statement has been (already) made. > > Remember CFJ 2086? :)
Er... I do now :P Whelp... that about covers it in excruciating detail.
