On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, omd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, woggle <[email protected]> wrote: > > See CFJ 1856 (finding that there was insufficient evidence, in a similar > > situation, that the act-on-behalf agreement met the historical versions of > > R101(iii) and R101(iv) and therefore judged such an attempt unsuccessful). > > Arguments: djanatyn has demonstrated direct knowledge of the fora - > well, a non-Foreign forum, at any rate.
I'll be interested to see if a reasonable requirement is that the person show up in PF and say for the record "yup, I get this". (Having seen omd's evidence, I'm on the fence on this at the moment). -G.
