On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote: > >> Voting results for Proposals 7435-36: >> >> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the >> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to >> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] >> >> x7435 2.0 scshunt Numericity >> !7436 3.0 scshunt De-persist commitments >> >> 7435 7436 >> >> Machiavel 4F >> omd 4A 4A >> Roujo 4P 4P >> scshunt 4F 4F >> Walker 4A 4F >> Wes 4A 4F >> woggle 4P 4P >> >> AI 2 3 >> VI 0.6+ 3 >> F/A 8/12 12/4 >> >> Quorum 7 7 >> Voters 7 6 >> >> [scshunt's votes are only effective if the voting periods were >> extended. If they weren't, then the proposals were rejected due >> to insufficient support, (4/12 = 0.3+ vs 2) and (8/4 = 2 vs 3) >> respectively.] > > > Again, no self-ratification, as omd's CoE "quorum was 5" is still > outstanding. > > CoE, accepted: Quorum on each of these was 6. (Active players were > the same as for 7426-34.) > > omd's CoE "quorum was 5" and G.'s CoE regarding missed votes are > rejected as inaccurate. > > I resolve these decisions as follows: > * Quorum was 6 > * scshunt's votes were inactive > * Proposals were rejected due to insufficient support, (4/12 = 0.3+ > vs 2) and (8/4 = 2 vs 3) respectively > * Other details were as noted above and below
CoE: Since quorum was 6, Proposal 7435 had only 5 votes, so the voting period was extended and my votes were valid. Hence it was adopted. -scshunt
