Yes, it had occurred to me that Rule 219 is unclear if the "move" under consideration has to be an actual or at least attempted move, or if a hypothetical move is sufficient. If the latter, well, here it is. If the former, then I needed to get the ball rolling by making a CFJ anyway. (Although I suppose I could have disguised it by making a seemingly-unrelated CFJ first and waiting for an assignment on that.)
As for any ordering of actions occuring in the same message, that's tradition (possibly law?) in Agora itself, but I don't know whether Agoran tradition carries over to Agora XX. Chuck > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, wrote: > >> I invoke judgement on the following statement: The selection of a Judge >> for this statement is a move whose legality cannot be determined with >> finality. > > > I think you need to wait until a purported selection actually occurs. > > In any case, this might be enough - congratulations (and my bad!) - but I > note that as the actions later in a message are traditionally considered > to > occur an instant later, it would be a reasonable principle to say that the > later voting periods also end instants later. >
