On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, omd wrote: > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, wrote: > I invoke judgement on the following statement: The selection of a Judge > for this statement is a move whose legality cannot be determined with > finality. > > > I think you need to wait until a purported selection actually occurs. > > In any case, this might be enough - congratulations (and my bad!) - but I > note that as the actions later in a message are traditionally considered > to occur an instant later, it would be a reasonable principle to say that the > later voting periods also end instants later.
Notice the "same time" language in R305. (I dunno if this is an argument for or against, just thought I'd point it out). -Goethe
