Argh ****** ****
Yes, Chuck did privately vote against 344. And no, Walker did vote
against, he changed his public for to a private against about 9 hours
later.
So it's actually 4:4, fail, we're back to rule 343. Yally did not get 10
points for proposing 344. Walker, Goethe, and omd did not get 5 points
for voting against 344.
Here are the votes I have recorded.
Jun 26 08:55 Walker public vote FOR [CANCELLED]
10:11 ehird public vote FOR [CANCELLED]
12:13 ehird public vote FOR
12:26 Steve public vote FOR
13:20 Michael public vote FOR
14:12 Roujo public vote INVALID
17:56 Walker private vote AGAINST
27 01:19 Yally public vote FOR
02:42 Goethe public vote AGAINST
03:44 Chuck private vote AGAINST
11:20 omd private vote AGAINST
I have no idea how I got Chuck in the FOR column. Officially, I'll just
blame Roujo and his stunt voting for confusing me.
Sorry about that folks!
-Dan
PS: here's the actual rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 343 (Mutable)
The game shall end immediately following the end of the voting period
on any proposals which were submitted by 00:04:30 GMT +1200 June 29,
2013, and the adoption of any rule changes caused by such proposals,
and all Voters having a score greater than the median score among
Voters shall win.
History:
Initial Immutable Rule 112, Jun. 30 1993
Amended for Vigintennial by decree, Jun. 17 2013
Transmuted by Proposal 311 (omd), Jun. 23 2013
Amended by Proposal 326 (Chuck), Jun. 24 2013
Amended by Proposal 342 (Chuck), Jun. 26 2013
Amended by Proposal 343 (Chuck), Jun. 26 2013
[NOT Amended by Proposal 344 (Yally), Jun. 27 2013 -- MISREPORTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
