On 27/06/2013 8:43 PM, Steven Gardner wrote:
On 28 June 2013 10:36, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com <mailto:fool1...@gmail.com>> wrote:In this case, the effect was your forfeiture (or requirement to forfeit). It was based on events that occurred prior, but the effect was not retroactive. I disagree. R345 describes a sequence of actions that lead to forfeiture. To avoid retroactive application, the entire sequence of events has to begin after R345 takes effect. Steve
Well, we've been doing that right from the start. With points rather than forfeiture, but same idea. It was explicitly ruled that this did not violate R108. (This might also have been the first CFJ in Agora itself.)
-Dan
