On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, omd wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > I thought at one point the complete silence at how one becomes a player > > was quite weak (I guess it came up with the forfeiture-forcing). Walker, > > consider taking note! -G. > > Incidentally, I disliked the judgement that a requirement for someone > to do something "immediately" implies a legal fiction that e did it: > although it's the only interpretation that gives the clause teeth, > that clause could also have been easily written in a way that does not > require such implication and I do not think that there is much > precedent for its historical use in Agora proper*. Oh well.
I disliked the decision of course, but actually liked the meta-decision that, with a blank slate free from Agoran precedence, a single judgement had a range of ways it could go, all within reason, that could swing the dynamics considerably.
