On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Would the following meet the "reasonably available" test: > > Conditions for Cashing: the message is within the bounds of messages > allowed by the private NONDEAD agreement. This is assumed to be > true unless the author publicly CoEs the cashing within 72 hours, > providing the appropriate agreement text showing that it is out of > bounds. > > Hmm, maybe.
Probably not; it seems like the sort of thing that could be used to retroactively create a paradox. I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise "I perform the specified action with the sha-1 hash <long hex string here>". For bonus points, you could even transfer it to the Tree, leaving it unclear who you'd made the promise to. -- ais523
