On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 22:25 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 3 July 2013 22:11, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise "I perform > > the specified action with the sha-1 hash <long hex string here>". For > > bonus points, you could even transfer it to the Tree, leaving it unclear > > who you'd made the promise to. > > I think encryption where you reveal the private key is better. There > are presumably an infinite number of actions with any given SHA-1 hash > (or at least we can't rule that out).
Nah, you can be made to perform any of those actions, the casher just specifies which. Perhaps it requires better wording, or moving the hash to a cashing condition. -- ais523
