On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:

I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in,
"satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").

FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not
that that really counts for anything. (And not that either
interpretation is obviously broken.)

Before Steve pointed out the ambiguity, I also read it with omd's interpretation.


Reply via email to