On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, John Smith wrote: > I intend with 1 ais523 support to join the alliance containing ais523. > > CfJ, barring ais523: "If ais523 immediately replies to that intent with 'I > support and do so', I become a member of the same alliance as ais523." > > Arguments: > With the current wording of Rule 1728, the person who says "I do so" performs > the action, regardless of who the initiator is. This results in ais523 > joining the alliance. > > Evidence: > > ais523 is the only member of his alliance according to the most recent > Registrar report.
I'm not sure why this is a scam or shenanigan, as either way it requires ais523's support. Seems like a straightforward use of the rule.
