On 29/07/2013 10:43 PM, omd wrote:
Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by appending:
In general, the gamestate only changes as explicitly envisioned
by the Rules, and an absurdity that can be concluded from the
assumption that a statement is false does not constitute proof
that it is true.
I'm not sure I understand what this is supposed to do.
