On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I said right off the bat, I didn't CFJ a free-floating version of Curry's > paradox. And that is basically why. Because then you only have to argue some > alternate logic for free-floating statements. Typically, for example, just > ignore it and say it's meaningless or something.
The paradox CFJs are good evidence that we try to avoid having alternate logic for free-floating statements; in any case, otherwise, we could by the same token call the conditions of your promises meaningless.
