Walker wrote:
This was a reference to a rule from a few years ago: basically, your
voting limit varied based on a rock-paper-scissors type interaction
between your chamber and that of the proposal's author.
Was that any good? I don't think I hung around long enough to see how that
played out.
I thought so, there was some actual strategy around it. *searches
local archives* Lasted not quite a year; you proposed it in October
2009, G. repealed it in September 2010 (Proposal 6821) in favor of
the List of Succession (for the Speakership, where the top N positions
also had various powers associated with them).
