On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Ed Murphy wrote: > Walker wrote: > > > > This was a reference to a rule from a few years ago: basically, your > > > voting limit varied based on a rock-paper-scissors type interaction > > > between your chamber and that of the proposal's author. > > > > Was that any good? I don't think I hung around long enough to see how that > > played out. > > I thought so, there was some actual strategy around it. *searches > local archives* Lasted not quite a year; you proposed it in October > 2009, G. repealed it in September 2010 (Proposal 6821) in favor of > the List of Succession (for the Speakership, where the top N positions > also had various powers associated with them).
There was strategy, but it was rarely used - lots of apathy. In fact, it led to a mass-win when I submitted proposals of each color, each one saying "everyone of color X wins", and no one cared enough to stop them all from passing, and everyone won.
