>So, our system is that we basically just have one player playing the game who optionally takes advice on how to play it? That doesn't seem very nomicy to me (even if it's the best way for us to play chess).
>I'd prefer some sort of move voting system, perhaps where everyone can vote on one of the legal moves available to Agora and the Grandmastor is then obligated to play that move (and he would serve as the vote collector and break ties). Voting periods would probably need to be less than 7 days. Yeah, that's why I sent it around for discussion.Nommit will probably make them by consensus, as we have fewer players. It would be up to Agora to determine how to submit its moves. Someone in ##nomic suggested this way but I was originally thinking a voting mechanism of some kind.
