Think I posted it but will re-post, I suggest something like:
When a move is required, the Grandmastor SHALL, With Notice, submit
the Agoran move. In giving notice to so submit, e SHOULD announce a
list of candidate moves, although any player can announce other candidate
move. The Grandmastor, in submitting the move, SHALL submit the
legal-in-chess candidate move with the greatest SUPPORT/OBJECT ratio;
if no such move, e CAN choose from available moves.
(pls wordsmith and propose if you like this concept, prob. won't do it
myself).
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, James Beirne wrote:
> >So, our system is that we basically just have one player playing the game
> >who optionally takes advice on how to play it? That doesn't seem very nomicy
> >to me (even if it's the
> best way for us to play chess).
>
> >I'd prefer some sort of move voting system, perhaps where everyone can vote
> >on one of the legal moves available to Agora and the Grandmastor is then
> >obligated to play that move
> (and he would serve as the vote collector and break ties). Voting periods
> would probably need to be less than 7 days.
> Yeah, that's why I sent it around for discussion.Nommit will probably make
> them by consensus, as we have fewer players. It would be up to Agora to
> determine how to submit its
> moves. Someone in ##nomic suggested this way but I was originally thinking a
> voting mechanism of some kind.
>
>
