On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > > In contrast, and in line with Norrish' subgame manifesto, I think a > > subgame that's encoded into the Agoran rules is the way to go. > > Makes sense. In that context, is there any major difference to you > between an "economic system" and a "subgame"? (my point being, maybe > we've been doing this, just not doing it in a very engaging way of > late because we're calling it an economy not a game). -G. > The economies aren't really subgames because they interact with the whole of Agora.
