You want a sub-game that has the legalistic flavour of Agora so that people who like that legal-beagle stuff will want to play the sub-game.
Michael On 17/12/13 08:42, Tanner Swett wrote: > Re what a subgame is, I think I'd define "subgame" as something like > "delimited set of activities intended to be fun primarily for its own sake". > A subgame doesn't have to be defined outside of the ruleset, nor is it > necessary for a subgame to be isolated from the rest of Agora (but there > should be some dividing line there for it to be a "subgame"). > > On Dec 16, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> The economies aren't really subgames because they interact with the whole >>> of Agora. >> >> Ok, we want a subgame that 'kinda' interacts, maybe just through >> Score/winning, >> but not requiring participation in order to vote, make proposals etc. About >> right? > > I'm not so sure. If a subgame only interacts with Agora through winning and > whatnot, then it's just a game played on the same mailing list, where you get > a tiny prize if you win. But I suppose that's not much of a problem; if a > subgame is fun, it's going to remain fun even if it's not attached to the > outer game. > > —Arufonsu >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
