On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> WHEREAS, new research indicates that Rule 106 in fact set the power > >> Proposal 7448 to 4 prior to its taking effect; > > > > When an unproven counterfactual argument goes against the dominant > > current records, and a CFJ on the matter has been called, any further > > diverging the gamestate is Bad Form, no matter how strongly you > > feel about your argument. > > Erp, I missed that a CFJ had been called. My apologies. You're right.
no worries! I'll deputize to assign the CFJ if no one jumps into the Arbitor role by tomorrow. -t.
