I vote against. This sounds like an evil plan for omd to win. > On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Sprocklem <sprock...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2015-08-03 19:29, omd wrote: >> I submit the following proposal, pend it, and specially deputise for >> the Promotor to distribute it, thereby expediting it. For this >> decision, the options are FOR and AGAINST, the vote collector is the >> Assessor, and the AI is the same as the AI of the proposal. The >> decision's author is arguably no one, or possibly me (I authored the >> proposal, but that isn't what Rule 1950 technically asks about). >> >> Proposal: Mammon Machine (AI=0.2) >> >> Create a new Power-0.2 Rule: >> >> Whoever omd has publicly specified should win the game as a >> result of the proposal "Mammon Machine" does so upon the >> enactment of this rule. Then this rule repeals itself. >> >> [That set of people is likely to be correlated with the set of FOR voters.] >> >> Do whatever else omd has publicly specified this proposal should do. >> [Ideas?] > > I vote AGAINST. I feel something like this would be of more success if I > didn't know how many were voting what. > > -- > Sprocklem
